Tagalog AI humanizer

Keep Tagalog courtesy attached to the relationship

A message to a parent, an older colleague or a customer can need a different level of respect from a note to a close friend. Before rewriting, identify who is speaking to whom. Keep po where it belongs in your draft, and review any added respectful wording in context. Sprinkling it throughout a paragraph does not automatically make the message more considerate.

The meeting notice above has no direct address to a recipient. That makes removing its introductory phrase a fairly small edit. A request addressed to a particular person needs another check: has the revision kept the request polite, or turned it into an instruction? Read the opening and the request together before accepting either one.

Decide how much Taglish belongs in this draft

A workplace message might deliberately keep deadline, meeting or a product name in English. If those are the terms your colleagues use, replacing each one with a formal alternative can make the message harder to recognize. State which English expressions should remain when you ask for a follow-up. Conversely, a school submission or public notice may call for a more consistent Filipino register. Make that choice for the specific document instead of asking the editor to maximize either English or Tagalog vocabulary. The useful question is whether the intended reader would understand the wording without stopping to translate it.

Check the actor after a sentence changes shape

When a long sentence becomes shorter, compare who performs the action and who receives it. A meeting announcement, a request to arrange that meeting and a promise to attend it are different messages. Retain the relevant person or group even when the shorter version would sound smoother without it. Also check whether the action is planned, ongoing or already finished.

For a customer reply, review the salutation and closing with the body. A respectful beginning followed by an abruptly casual instruction can feel inconsistent. Try a follow-up such as: Keep the existing po, retain the English product names, and make only the request easier to follow. That gives you a limited change to evaluate. For school or public-facing material, have a fluent Tagalog reader check idiomatic phrasing and any local usage before publication.

Start with the Tagalog you want to keep

Paste a complete Tagalog paragraph into the editor. A sentence taken out of context can leave a pronoun, tone choice or reference unclear. Include enough surrounding text to show who is speaking and what the reader needs to do. You can also import a plain TXT or Markdown file; formatting from a PDF or word processor is not imported.

The page is written in English, but your draft stays in its original language by default. Visiting this page does not translate the whole website or turn an English draft into Tagalog. If your text deliberately combines languages, make that choice explicit in a follow-up and check that borrowed words still belong in the result.

Use one precise follow-up

After reading the first result, identify the part that still needs work. For this page, a useful instruction is: “Keep the message in Tagalog. Use a polite tone and preserve the meeting time.” This gives the revision a concrete target and tells it which details must survive. A broad request to make everything “more human” gives you less control over the change.

Your next rewrite uses the current working text. You can edit that text yourself before asking for a new version. Signed-in writers can save a manual version for free, then request a follow-up. Each successful model revision costs one credit; editing the words directly does not.

Judge the result against the source

Read the Tagalog result aloud when you can. Check where a sentence pauses and whether its level of formality fits the recipient. Then compare the original facts separately. Smooth wording can still change a deadline, remove a qualification or make a tentative claim sound certain.

Keep names, numbers, quotations and citations beside the original while reviewing. For specialist material, ask someone who understands the subject and language to check the final draft. The example on this page illustrates an editorial choice; it is not a live model benchmark or a promise that every rewrite will make the same change.

Keep control of the working version

The editor places your original beside the result on a wide screen and stacks them on a phone. Use See changes to inspect the revision, or edit the result directly. Copy the finished text or download it as TXT or Markdown. A download contains the text you see, including your manual changes.

Signed-in writers can return to saved articles and their versions. A follow-up starts from the working text, so review any manual changes before submitting it. Your saved history stays available even when your credits run out or a subscription ends, until you choose to delete the article.

What a rewrite costs

A successful rewrite costs one credit. A successful follow-up also costs one. Typing, importing, reviewing, copying and downloading do not use credits. When a request is accepted, one credit is reserved; it is settled after the finished result is saved. A confirmed failure releases the reservation. An uncertain result stays pending while it is checked.

An anonymous visitor has one successful trial. First login grants five permanent credits. Beginning on the next UTC day, the first visit each day grants one credit that expires at midnight UTC. Missed daily gifts are not added later. Anonymous results are kept for up to 24 hours after completion; signing in can attach the result to your account.

The free limit is 1,000 units per request. Basic supports 5,000 and Pro supports 10,000; a remaining paid credit pack without a subscription supports 5,000. The same limit applies to the current text in a follow-up. The editor counts words and CJK characters using the same rule as the server. Check the displayed count before submitting. Compare plans and credit rules.

Readability is the goal

AI Humanize uses writing guidance based on the open-source blader/humanizer project. It asks a language model to remove unhelpful writing patterns while preserving the message. A readable result still needs your judgment: the tool does not verify facts, certify authorship or guarantee an AI-detector outcome.

Keep any required disclosure, citation or review process for your work. Avoid pasting confidential material unless you have permission to use it here. Read the privacy policy for how submitted text and saved history are handled.