Vietnamese AI humanizer

Start with the Vietnamese relationship words

Vietnamese forms of address can tell the reader how the people in a message relate to one another. Anh, chị, em and bạn are not interchangeable decorations. Keep the choices made by the writer when they are intentional, and supply the relationship in a follow-up if the context is missing. A generic request for a friendly tone may otherwise produce a voice that feels wrong for the recipient.

Review who uses each form as well as which form appears. A message can quote someone else or describe an exchange between several people. After a sentence is shortened, confirm that the speaker, recipient and third person still have the same roles.

Keep tone marks and time expressions exact

Treat Vietnamese diacritics as part of the words, including in names. Do not accept a version that loses them because the broad meaning seems recognizable. Compare time expressions separately from style: the example keeps nine tomorrow morning, so removing its opening is an editorial change without a scheduling change. For an invitation, also preserve the location and any time zone. If the source uses a relative date such as tomorrow, check that it still makes sense on the day you will actually send the message.

Make long explanations readable without forcing English rhythm

A Vietnamese paragraph does not need an explicit transition at the beginning of every sentence. Check whether the ideas already connect through their subject and sequence. Remove a formal lead-in when it simply announces the next fact, but keep a connector that explains a cause or exception. A shorter version should still show why the next action follows from the previous sentence.

The editor counter is a submission limit, not a linguistic assessment. Vietnamese uses spaces within many multi-syllable expressions, so the displayed units need not match your intuitive count of complete words. Review that counter before submitting a longer passage rather than estimating from an English document of similar visual length. For your next edit, ask to preserve the existing forms of address and all tone marks while shortening one repetitive explanation. Read the result as a whole message before copying it into the final channel.

Start with the Vietnamese you want to keep

Paste a complete Vietnamese paragraph into the editor. A sentence taken out of context can leave a pronoun, tone choice or reference unclear. Include enough surrounding text to show who is speaking and what the reader needs to do. You can also import a plain TXT or Markdown file; formatting from a PDF or word processor is not imported.

The page is written in English, but your draft stays in its original language by default. Visiting this page does not translate the whole website or turn an English draft into Vietnamese. If your text deliberately combines languages, make that choice explicit in a follow-up and check that borrowed words still belong in the result.

Use one precise follow-up

After reading the first result, identify the part that still needs work. For this page, a useful instruction is: “Keep the Vietnamese forms of address from the original. Remove filler and retain the exact meeting time.” This gives the revision a concrete target and tells it which details must survive. A broad request to make everything “more human” gives you less control over the change.

Your next rewrite uses the current working text. You can edit that text yourself before asking for a new version. Signed-in writers can save a manual version for free, then request a follow-up. Each successful model revision costs one credit; editing the words directly does not.

Judge the result against the source

Read the Vietnamese result aloud when you can. Check where a sentence pauses and whether its level of formality fits the recipient. Then compare the original facts separately. Smooth wording can still change a deadline, remove a qualification or make a tentative claim sound certain.

Keep names, numbers, quotations and citations beside the original while reviewing. For specialist material, ask someone who understands the subject and language to check the final draft. The example on this page illustrates an editorial choice; it is not a live model benchmark or a promise that every rewrite will make the same change.

Keep control of the working version

The editor places your original beside the result on a wide screen and stacks them on a phone. Use See changes to inspect the revision, or edit the result directly. Copy the finished text or download it as TXT or Markdown. A download contains the text you see, including your manual changes.

Signed-in writers can return to saved articles and their versions. A follow-up starts from the working text, so review any manual changes before submitting it. Your saved history stays available even when your credits run out or a subscription ends, until you choose to delete the article.

What a rewrite costs

A successful rewrite costs one credit. A successful follow-up also costs one. Typing, importing, reviewing, copying and downloading do not use credits. When a request is accepted, one credit is reserved; it is settled after the finished result is saved. A confirmed failure releases the reservation. An uncertain result stays pending while it is checked.

An anonymous visitor has one successful trial. First login grants five permanent credits. Beginning on the next UTC day, the first visit each day grants one credit that expires at midnight UTC. Missed daily gifts are not added later. Anonymous results are kept for up to 24 hours after completion; signing in can attach the result to your account.

The free limit is 1,000 units per request. Basic supports 5,000 and Pro supports 10,000; a remaining paid credit pack without a subscription supports 5,000. The same limit applies to the current text in a follow-up. The editor counts words and CJK characters using the same rule as the server. Check the displayed count before submitting. Compare plans and credit rules.

Readability is the goal

AI Humanize uses writing guidance based on the open-source blader/humanizer project. It asks a language model to remove unhelpful writing patterns while preserving the message. A readable result still needs your judgment: the tool does not verify facts, certify authorship or guarantee an AI-detector outcome.

Keep any required disclosure, citation or review process for your work. Avoid pasting confidential material unless you have permission to use it here. Read the privacy policy for how submitted text and saved history are handled.