Thai AI humanizer

Keep Thai courtesy tied to the speaker and situation

Polite particles and forms of address contribute to the voice of a Thai message. Keep the choices that fit the speaker, recipient and channel. A revision should not add the same particle mechanically to every sentence or assume a different speaker identity. If the context is missing, state the intended relationship in your follow-up.

A short public notice and a personal customer reply can require different phrasing. The meeting example on this page is a plain announcement. It demonstrates removing a formal introduction; it does not establish the right closing particle or personal address for every situation. Review those choices in your own complete message.

Review sentence boundaries without adding English-style spaces

Thai text does not generally separate each word with spaces in the way English does. Do not insert spaces throughout the draft to make it look shorter or to influence the editor counter. Instead, inspect where the reader can pause and whether a long passage needs a clear sentence boundary. Preserve a connector when it explains why an action follows or when an exception applies. Splitting the paragraph should not detach a condition from the instruction it limits.

Check dates and mixed Thai-English details after copying

A Thai paragraph can include English product names, links and numerals. Keep the exact labels a reader must recognize elsewhere, and compare dates with the source rather than assuming that a calendar or numeral change is harmless. If the original specifies morning or evening, retain that distinction. Relative expressions such as tomorrow also need to match the day you will send the message.

The displayed submission count is a technical allowance, not an assessment of Thai word segmentation. Check it before submitting and keep complete phrases together when preparing a passage. A focused follow-up could ask for natural Thai phrasing, the existing polite particles and unchanged dates, while removing only repetitive introductions. Read the result in the final application to inspect line wrapping and punctuation. A fluent Thai reader should review idiom and courtesy for published material; a readable layout alone does not prove that every language choice is correct.

Start with the Thai you want to keep

Paste a complete Thai paragraph into the editor. A sentence taken out of context can leave a pronoun, tone choice or reference unclear. Include enough surrounding text to show who is speaking and what the reader needs to do. You can also import a plain TXT or Markdown file; formatting from a PDF or word processor is not imported.

The page is written in English, but your draft stays in its original language by default. Visiting this page does not translate the whole website or turn an English draft into Thai. If your text deliberately combines languages, make that choice explicit in a follow-up and check that borrowed words still belong in the result.

Use one precise follow-up

After reading the first result, identify the part that still needs work. For this page, a useful instruction is: “Keep natural Thai phrasing and the existing polite particles. Preserve the meeting schedule and avoid adding unnecessary spaces.” This gives the revision a concrete target and tells it which details must survive. A broad request to make everything “more human” gives you less control over the change.

Your next rewrite uses the current working text. You can edit that text yourself before asking for a new version. Signed-in writers can save a manual version for free, then request a follow-up. Each successful model revision costs one credit; editing the words directly does not.

Judge the result against the source

Read the Thai result aloud when you can. Check where a sentence pauses and whether its level of formality fits the recipient. Then compare the original facts separately. Smooth wording can still change a deadline, remove a qualification or make a tentative claim sound certain.

Keep names, numbers, quotations and citations beside the original while reviewing. For specialist material, ask someone who understands the subject and language to check the final draft. The example on this page illustrates an editorial choice; it is not a live model benchmark or a promise that every rewrite will make the same change.

Keep control of the working version

The editor places your original beside the result on a wide screen and stacks them on a phone. Use See changes to inspect the revision, or edit the result directly. Copy the finished text or download it as TXT or Markdown. A download contains the text you see, including your manual changes.

Signed-in writers can return to saved articles and their versions. A follow-up starts from the working text, so review any manual changes before submitting it. Your saved history stays available even when your credits run out or a subscription ends, until you choose to delete the article.

What a rewrite costs

A successful rewrite costs one credit. A successful follow-up also costs one. Typing, importing, reviewing, copying and downloading do not use credits. When a request is accepted, one credit is reserved; it is settled after the finished result is saved. A confirmed failure releases the reservation. An uncertain result stays pending while it is checked.

An anonymous visitor has one successful trial. First login grants five permanent credits. Beginning on the next UTC day, the first visit each day grants one credit that expires at midnight UTC. Missed daily gifts are not added later. Anonymous results are kept for up to 24 hours after completion; signing in can attach the result to your account.

The free limit is 1,000 units per request. Basic supports 5,000 and Pro supports 10,000; a remaining paid credit pack without a subscription supports 5,000. The same limit applies to the current text in a follow-up. The editor counts words and CJK characters using the same rule as the server. Check the displayed count before submitting. Compare plans and credit rules.

Readability is the goal

AI Humanize uses writing guidance based on the open-source blader/humanizer project. It asks a language model to remove unhelpful writing patterns while preserving the message. A readable result still needs your judgment: the tool does not verify facts, certify authorship or guarantee an AI-detector outcome.

Keep any required disclosure, citation or review process for your work. Avoid pasting confidential material unless you have permission to use it here. Read the privacy policy for how submitted text and saved history are handled.