Korean AI humanizer

Keep one appropriate Korean speech level

Sentence endings help establish the relationship between a Korean writer and reader. A revision should not alternate casually between levels just to vary its rhythm. Choose the level appropriate to the document, then check every ending in the passage. Formal polite writing can still be concise, as the meeting example on this page illustrates.

Speech level and honorific reference are related but separate checks. A sentence can address the reader politely while also referring respectfully to another person. Shortening the opening must not remove an honorific that the situation requires. Identify who is speaking, who is reading and who is being discussed before evaluating the tone.

Make the subject clear when context changes

Korean often leaves a subject implicit when the conversation supplies it. A rewrite that deletes the preceding sentence can leave the reader uncertain about who will attend, send or approve something. Keep the necessary name or role when several people are involved. Review particles after rearranging the sentence, because the relationship between the topic and action may change. The shorter sentence should preserve the same responsibility and emphasis, not merely sound smoother when read on its own.

Review spacing, technical labels and the character count

Check Korean spacing in the complete phrase after a substitution. Preserve exact software labels, names and abbreviations when readers must find them elsewhere. A borrowed technical term may be clearer than an unfamiliar replacement, especially if the organization already uses it. Keep that term and improve the surrounding explanation instead of changing vocabulary for variety.

The editor uses character-based units for Korean alongside words in mixed-language text. Look at the displayed count before submitting, since a visually compact paragraph may not correspond to the same allowance as an English paragraph. For the next revision, you could ask to keep formal polite endings and the existing honorifics while removing only repetitive setup phrases. Compare dates, times and statements of completion with the source afterward. A promise to investigate an issue must remain distinct from a claim that it is solved, however natural the sentence ending sounds.

Start with the Korean you want to keep

Paste a complete Korean paragraph into the editor. A sentence taken out of context can leave a pronoun, tone choice or reference unclear. Include enough surrounding text to show who is speaking and what the reader needs to do. You can also import a plain TXT or Markdown file; formatting from a PDF or word processor is not imported.

The page is written in English, but your draft stays in its original language by default. Visiting this page does not translate the whole website or turn an English draft into Korean. If your text deliberately combines languages, make that choice explicit in a follow-up and check that borrowed words still belong in the result.

Use one precise follow-up

After reading the first result, identify the part that still needs work. For this page, a useful instruction is: “Keep formal polite Korean endings. Shorten repetitive openings without changing honorifics or the meeting time.” This gives the revision a concrete target and tells it which details must survive. A broad request to make everything “more human” gives you less control over the change.

Your next rewrite uses the current working text. You can edit that text yourself before asking for a new version. Signed-in writers can save a manual version for free, then request a follow-up. Each successful model revision costs one credit; editing the words directly does not.

Judge the result against the source

Read the Korean result aloud when you can. Check where a sentence pauses and whether its level of formality fits the recipient. Then compare the original facts separately. Smooth wording can still change a deadline, remove a qualification or make a tentative claim sound certain.

Keep names, numbers, quotations and citations beside the original while reviewing. For specialist material, ask someone who understands the subject and language to check the final draft. The example on this page illustrates an editorial choice; it is not a live model benchmark or a promise that every rewrite will make the same change.

Keep control of the working version

The editor places your original beside the result on a wide screen and stacks them on a phone. Use See changes to inspect the revision, or edit the result directly. Copy the finished text or download it as TXT or Markdown. A download contains the text you see, including your manual changes.

Signed-in writers can return to saved articles and their versions. A follow-up starts from the working text, so review any manual changes before submitting it. Your saved history stays available even when your credits run out or a subscription ends, until you choose to delete the article.

What a rewrite costs

A successful rewrite costs one credit. A successful follow-up also costs one. Typing, importing, reviewing, copying and downloading do not use credits. When a request is accepted, one credit is reserved; it is settled after the finished result is saved. A confirmed failure releases the reservation. An uncertain result stays pending while it is checked.

An anonymous visitor has one successful trial. First login grants five permanent credits. Beginning on the next UTC day, the first visit each day grants one credit that expires at midnight UTC. Missed daily gifts are not added later. Anonymous results are kept for up to 24 hours after completion; signing in can attach the result to your account.

The free limit is 1,000 units per request. Basic supports 5,000 and Pro supports 10,000; a remaining paid credit pack without a subscription supports 5,000. The same limit applies to the current text in a follow-up. The editor counts words and CJK characters using the same rule as the server. Check the displayed count before submitting. Compare plans and credit rules.

Readability is the goal

AI Humanize uses writing guidance based on the open-source blader/humanizer project. It asks a language model to remove unhelpful writing patterns while preserving the message. A readable result still needs your judgment: the tool does not verify facts, certify authorship or guarantee an AI-detector outcome.

Keep any required disclosure, citation or review process for your work. Avoid pasting confidential material unless you have permission to use it here. Read the privacy policy for how submitted text and saved history are handled.